75 Songwriters Want More Royalties from Radio

General Radio News and Comments, Satellite & Internet Radio and LPFM

75 Songwriters Want More Royalties from Radio

Postby jon » Wed Nov 22, 2017 4:36 pm

Your Favorite Radio Hits May Go Silent
Songwriters threaten to withhold their music if stations don’t give them a bigger share of revenue.
By Lucas Shaw
Bloomberg Businessweek
November 22, 2017, 4:00 AM MST
Corrected November 22, 2017, 1:16 PM MST

Jon Bon Jovi got his big break in the early 1980s after spending an entire day waiting to pester a disc jockey at a radio station on Long Island, N.Y., to play a demo of a song he’d written. The album with that song, Runaway, went on to sell more than 1 million copies and helped fuel the career of one of the most enduring rock artists of the past four decades. Now, Bon Jovi is again lobbying radio officials, and this time the impact could be far larger. He and about 75 other artists—including such staples of the airwaves as Drake, Pharrell Williams, Steve Miller, and Bruce Springsteen—have joined supermanager Irving Azoff’s crusade to press radio stations to boost the royalties they pay writers when they play their songs. That figure hasn’t budged in decades, and Azoff says artists may pull some of their music off the air if their concerns aren’t addressed.

“This isn’t about the guy in my position, but about my buddies who are very good songwriters who try to make a living just songwriting,” says Bon Jovi, whose latest tour grossed more than $40 million this year. “Who will champion them? There is no charity show for the songwriter.”

For all the fuss about streaming services Spotify, YouTube, and Apple Music, radio is still the lifeblood of the music business. It’s the most common way music is listened to in the U.S., where 240 million people tune in every week, and stations generate about $18 billion in radio advertising annually from news, talk, sports, and music.

Under the industry’s confusing business model, radio companies pay about 4 percent of their music-related advertising revenue to songwriters. That’s a smaller share of the ad haul than Pandora, Spotify, or YouTube pays artists. (Performers aren’t compensated for radio airplay; instead they make money from music sales, streaming, and touring.)

Enter Azoff, a former head of the MCA record label and ex-chairman of concert promoter Live Nation Entertainment Inc., who’s best known as the manager for such mega-acts as Bon Jovi, the Eagles, and Christina Aguilera. He and industry veteran Randy Grimmett founded Global Music Rights, which is demanding that radio stations pay its big-name artist-songwriters a higher rate—but less than digital and internet radio services pay.

Stations have responded with a lawsuit, accusing Azoff of anticompetitive behavior. He countersued, and the litigation is ongoing. The stations don’t seem to want to settle, Azoff says, and if the suit doesn’t go his way, he may have only one recourse: taking Pharrell’s Happy off the radio, along with other songs. “A radio music licensing cartel—that’s what their behavior depicts,” he says of the current industry setup. “When it smells like a cartel and acts like a cartel, in my language, that’s a cartel.”

The Radio Music License Committee, which represents the industry’s 10,000 commercial stations in licensing matters, has denied that characterization in a court filing. “We would be comfortable with maintaining the status quo,” says RMLC Executive Director William Velez, who says the controversy has been fueled “because of rate envy” over the higher streaming royalties Pandora has agreed to pay artists.

Radio stations have fought artists’ efforts to collect a greater share of their sales since before World War II. At the time, the American Society of Composers, Authors and Publishers (Ascap) represented all popular music played on the radio. When Ascap announced in 1939 that it would raise its fees, broadcasters responded by creating their own performing rights organization, Broadcast Music Inc. (BMI). The rate paid to writers, which stood at 7.5 percent before the formation of BMI, now sits around 4 percent. For the past six decades, the rates have been governed by a special court created under a settlement with the U.S. Department of Justice.

Most artists have steered clear of a fight with the radio industry, for fear of upsetting the most important promotional vehicle in the world’s largest music market. Until as recently as the early 2000s, some record labels paid stations to play their songs. Even today, artists often play radio station concerts and festivals for free and are even asked to pay for at least a share of their airfare for such gigs.

“They built a billion-dollar business using my music,” says Miller, the songwriter of classic rock favorites including Fly Like an Eagle and The Joker. Miller, who owns the rights to his biggest hits, has always enjoyed steady play on classic rock stations but could never make sense of the royalty checks he received. His radio paychecks stagnated even as his record sales soared in the 1970s. He says he debated bringing a lawsuit against the stations but didn’t want to spend years in court. “I wish Irving came around in 1967,” Miller says. “This is my first chance at transparency.”

BMI and Ascap have also tried to raise royalty rates. BMI said its statements to artists “clearly reflect all performances including radio plays” and that it details how it calculates royalties on its website. Ascap Chief Executive Officer Elizabeth Matthews says its members receive “granular detail” about their payments and that the company has “a commitment to being fair and equitable as well as fully transparent.”

Azoff says he was drawn to enter the radio fight after seeing the checks paid to his artists decrease over the years. Ascap and BMI would change the advances and rates paid with little explanation, he says. One quarter they would pay more for urban artists, and another they’d pay more for pop stars such as Adam Levine. In recent years, classic rock acts got the short end of the stick.

“For classic guys, the checks were going down,” Azoff says. “They were getting played more and paid less.” Since most songwriters can’t tour—which is the primary way of making money for artists in the contemporary music business now that album sales have cratered—getting higher radio rights is key.

Azoff has persuaded two radio groups, including iHeartMedia Inc., to pay the higher fee. But most stations won’t. He says GMR is girding for a legal battle with the industry. “If we’re dragging up rights for everyone, it certainly will help emerging writers,” Azoff says. “We’re trying to make songwriting more valued across the board.”
(Corrects the rate that Global Music Rights wants radio stations to pay in the fifth paragraph.)

BOTTOM LINE - Radio remains the biggest venue for music entertainment in the U.S., with 240 million listeners each month. Some songwriters want a larger share of stations’ ad revenue.
User avatar
Advanced Member
Posts: 9184
Joined: Mon May 08, 2006 9:15 am
Location: Edmonton

Re: 75 Songwriters Want More Royalties from Radio

Postby Richard Skelly » Sun Nov 26, 2017 12:13 am

Given the dire circumstances of radio, this smacks of wresting blood out of a rock. Azoff and his high-profile supporters would be better off convincing artists to limit or withhold music to streaming services. Those high tech channels must start to narrow the gap between what they now pay for each song played (next to nothing) versus the existing rates forked over by radio.

In a perfect world, there would be a performance royalty to compensate band members, like the late Rolling Stone multi-instrumentalist Brian Jones, who seldom got songwriting credits. Yet they often immeasurably transformed raw, unfocused compositions into the fabulous finished hits we cherish.
Richard Skelly
Advanced Member
Posts: 447
Joined: Mon May 11, 2015 4:52 pm

Return to General Radio News

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 25 guests